Engineer-first by design: how we’re building TRU+ into a product engineers trust

The industry solved detection. Nobody solved action

Cloud cost anomaly detection has been “solved” for years—at least on paper. Alerts fire. Dashboards fill. Vendors promise visibility.

And yet the financial waste continues.

The reason is simple: anomaly detection has never created savings. It only created alerts engineers ignore. The bottleneck isn’t detection. It’s action.

That’s why TRU+ is built with a very explicit north star:

‍

🌍 Our vision: anomaly management as an autonomous layer of Cloud Ops

We’re working toward a world where every cloud anomaly is understood, resolved, or prevented—automatically. A future where cloud environments self-correct, financial waste is eliminated before it happens, and engineering teams are freed from reactive firefighting.

In that world, anomaly management isn’t a pile of alerts. It’s an autonomous, trusted layer of cloud operations.

But getting there requires something most tools never earn: engineer trust.

‍

🎯 Our mission: effortless resolution → decisions → autonomous cost-saving actions

TRU+ exists to empower engineers to resolve cloud anomalies effortlessly, and evolve their decisions into autonomous, cost-saving actions.

That means we go after the real pain:

• the noise,
• the friction,
• and the cognitive burden that comes with traditional cloud cost anomaly workflows.

Instead of throwing more alerts at teams, TRU+ gives engineers clear contextual insights and simple decision paths, then learns from what they do. Over time, those decisions become reusable, automated playbooks that can safely execute cost-saving actions on behalf of the team.

"This is the core idea behind our engineer-first development strategy: Engineers shouldn’t be the last mile of a broken FinOps loop. They should be the control point of a closed loop."

‍

‍

🚀 Our strategy: the closed loop that creates measurable ROI

The strategy is intentionally causal:

Engineers → take actions → actions resolve anomalies → resolved anomalies = measurable savings → FinOps sees ROI

"It’s not a slogan. It’s a product constraint. If we aren’t increasing engineer action and resolution rates, we aren’t creating savings—and we aren’t delivering value."

So we build TRU+ around three pillars.

‍

1) High-confidence, low-noise anomaly intelligence

Engineers have a strong allergy to unreliable systems. One or two false positives and the tool becomes background noise.

That’s why TRU+ prioritizes accuracy above all else.

We aim to surface only meaningful anomalies, enriched with the context engineers actually need:

• causality,
• severity,
• impact,
• and suggested next steps.

The bar is simple: every insight must increase trust, not noise—so engineers feel confident acting quickly.

‍

2) Engineer-centric workflow that removes friction

If you want engineers to act, don’t force them into a new workflow. Fit into theirs.

Engineers are TRU+’s primary users, so we meet them where they work—whether that’s Slack, Jira, CLI, or API. The experience must feel native, intuitive, and non-intrusive.

We optimize for:

• flow over formality,
• velocity over ceremony,
• clarity over clicks.

And crucially: actions should take minimal steps, with decisions recorded implicitly rather than forcing extra UI.

Because in the real world, a “small” workflow detour is exactly how tools lose adoption.

‍

‍

3) Captured decisions → transparent automation

Every engineer decision is signal:

• what matters,
• what doesn’t,
• and how issues should be resolved in this environment.

TRU+ turns these decision patterns into transparent, configurable automation—starting with low-risk actions and expanding only as trust builds.

Over time, the system becomes a self-reinforcing engine:

• it detects issues,
• resolves them,
• and increasingly prevents them before they create financial or operational impact.

That progression is intentional. We don’t jump straight to “full autonomy.” We earn it.

‍

‍

🧭 Our product development principles

Engineer-first product development isn’t “we love engineers” branding. It’s a set of tradeoffs we make repeatedly.

1) Prioritize engineers over FinOps

FinOps may buy the platform, but engineer adoption drives real ROI. When faced with tradeoffs, we choose the path that improves engineer experience, speed, and trust—because that compounds into measurable FinOps value.

2) Reduce cognitive load

Every interaction must simplify, not complicate. TRU+ removes ambiguity, unnecessary choices, and technical noise so engineers can focus on what matters: resolving the right issues at the right time.

3) Focus on actions, not alerts

Alerts alone create noise. TRU+ elevates anomalies into actionable paths: recommended steps, context, and safe-by-default execution options—shortening the distance between detection and resolution.

‍

‍

Our goal: Redefining cloud cost management

FinOps leaders already know the uncomfortable truth:

• anomaly detection is noisy,
• engineers don’t act,
• investigation is manual,
• repeat issues waste money,
• and cloud providers give detection away because detection by itself has no value.

“At TRU+, we are not selling detection. We are selling resolved anomalies and prevented waste.”

This is the category shift.

Basic Detection: the broken loop

Detect → Notify → Hope → No Action → No Savings

This is why anomaly detection has been historically hard to monetize: it doesn’t close the loop.

TRU+: the closed loop

Detect → Context → Action → Playbook → Automation → Cost Avoidance → ROI

TRU+ isn’t a FinOps feature. It’s a cost avoidance engine.

‍

‍

Our obsession: TRU+ should feel like a trusted teammate

At the end of the day, engineers don’t fall in love with dashboards.

‍

They trust systems that:

• are accurate,
• explain themselves,
• respect their time,
• reduce cognitive load,
• and help them ship with confidence.

"That’s our obsession with TRU+: build a product engineers trust enough to act on—and then turn those actions into compounding, autonomous cost avoidance."

Because the future of FinOps isn’t better reporting.

It’s resolved anomalies, prevented waste, and predictable savings—powered by an engineer-first workflow that actually closes the loop.

‍