If AI Optimizes the Cloud, What’s Left for FinOps?

Lately I’ve been reading a lot about FinOps going agentic and people in FinOps fearing for their jobs.

‍

There’s a quiet question floating around:

“If AI can optimize cloud costs autonomously… what exactly happens to us?”

‍

And honestly? It’s a fair question. Because this isn’t hypothetical anymore.

‍

‍

The Shift Is Already Happening

In January, Flexera acquired ProsperOps and Chaos Genius. The headline was about consolidation. The subtext was automation.

ProsperOps alone manages $6 billion in annual cloud spend and has delivered over $3 billion in savings — autonomously. Not by generating reports. Not by emailing recommendations. By taking action.

‍

At Microsoft Ignite, Azure introduced an Optimization Agent within Copilot — an AI that analyses usage, surfaces opportunities, and increasingly executes remediation steps.

‍

Vantage titled their 2025 retrospective:

“The Year FinOps Became Agentic.”

‍

That’s not marketing fluff. That’s positioning. And it doesn’t stop there.

• AWS has been steadily expanding automated Compute Optimizer recommendations and commitment management tooling.
• GCP’s Active Assist already auto-identifies idle resources and waste patterns.
• Datadog and Dynatrace are embedding cost-aware automation into observability workflows.
• Startups are building autonomous commitment portfolio managers that rebalance RI and Savings Plans exposure daily — something most FinOps teams do quarterly at best.

‍

The pattern is obvious. We’re moving from:

• Visibility
• Recommendations
• “Hey engineering, can you action this?”

To:

• Continuous analysis
• Policy-driven automation
• Real-time execution

And that changes things.

‍

‍

The Old FinOps Model

Let’s be honest about how FinOps has operated for the past few years.

• Step 1: Build dashboards.
• Step 2: Surface savings opportunities.
• Step 3: Present findings.
• Step 4: Hope someone prioritises them.

Sometimes they do. Sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they’re too busy shipping features.

‍

FinOps teams have been measured on:

• Savings identified
• Recommendations generated
• Reports delivered

‍

But “identified savings” and “realised savings” are not the same thing.

Agentic systems close that gap. They don’t wait. They act.

‍

‍

So What Happens to the FinOps Practitioner?

This is where the fear creeps in. If an AI agent can:

• Automatically rightsize instances
• Shut down idle resources
• Rebalance commitment portfolios
• Detect anomalies in real time
• Enforce budget guardrails
• Even simulate optimisation scenarios

What’s left for the human?

‍

Like some others, I don’t think FinOps disappears. But I do think the role transforms — dramatically.

‍

This Has Happened Before

We’ve seen this movie.

Monitoring used to mean people staring at dashboards. Then came:

• Automated alerting
• Auto-scaling
• Self-healing infrastructure

SRE didn’t eliminate operations.It elevated it.

‍

Finance experienced something similar:

• Manual bookkeeping → ERP automation
• Spreadsheet modelling → FP&A systems
• Static reporting → predictive forecasting

‍

The people who thrived moved up the value chain. The ones who defined their job by the manual task didn’t.

FinOps is at that same inflection point.

‍

‍

The Real Shift: From Optimiser to Economic Architect

The value in FinOps used to be:

“I found a $200k savings opportunity.”

‍

In an agentic world, the value becomes:

“I designed the economic system that continuously delivers optimised outcomes aligned with business strategy.”

‍

That’s a completely different skillset. It’s about:

• Defining unit economics frameworks
• Designing policy boundaries for automation
• Establishing acceptable risk levels
• Structuring commitment strategies
• Embedding cost into product and engineering decisions
• Aligning optimisation with growth, not just reduction

‍

An architectural cloud economist wins in this world.

Because when agents can execute, the differentiator becomes:

• Strategy
• Governance
• Intent

Not cost monitoring.

‍

‍

Why This Matters Now

Cloud environments are too dynamic for humans to manually optimise at scale.

• Savings opportunities decay in days.
• Usage patterns shift hourly.
• Commitment portfolios require continuous recalibration.
• Multi-cloud complexity compounds risk.

An AI agent can:

• Process millions of telemetry signals.
• Detect subtle trend deviations.
• Simulate optimisation scenarios instantly.
• Execute within defined guardrails.

‍

Humans simply can’t operate at that speed.

But humans define the guardrails. And that’s where the power shifts.

‍

‍

TRU+: Built for the Agentic FinOps Era

This is exactly why TruPositive AI (TRU+) exists.

TRU+ isn’t built for the “dashboard era” of FinOps. It’s built for what’s coming next. In a world where:

• AI agents take action.
• Automation is continuous.
• Optimisation is policy-driven.
• Engineering moves faster than quarterly reporting cycles.

‍

TRU+ focuses on the layer above execution. It enables organisations to:

• Define clear unit economics models
• Quantify true business impact — not just infra savings
• Set policies and guardrails for automated optimisation
• Align finance, product, and engineering around economic outcomes
• Track realised impact across teams
• Ensure automation serves strategy, not just efficiency

‍

In an agentic world, the question isn’t:

“Did we find savings?”

‍

It’s:

“Are our automated systems optimising for the right economic outcomes?”

‍

TRU+ is designed to answer that.

‍

‍

If You’re in FinOps Today

If you work in FinOps and specialise in cost optimization, I wouldn’t panic. But I would pivot.

Spend less time asking:

• “Where’s the next idle resource?”
• “Can we squeeze another 5% out of compute?”

‍

And more time asking:

• “What are our unit economics?”
• “What does profitable growth look like in our cloud model?”
• “What policies should govern autonomous optimisation?”
• “Where should we intentionally not optimise?”

‍

Because agents will optimize.

FinOps leaders will orchestrate.

‍

And the ones who learn to design the economic architecture — instead of manually operating inside it — will define the next era of this industry.

‍

Nobody knows what the future will bring.

But the shift feels very real.